<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New FE-4000 and FE-4010, Another Identical Cameras from Olympus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joenelumal.com/digital-cameras/new-fe-4000-and-fe-4010-another-identical-cameras-from-olympus/index.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joenelumal.com/digital-cameras/new-fe-4000-and-fe-4010-another-identical-cameras-from-olympus/index.html</link>
	<description>Technology Reviews, Blogging, News, and Life in the Philippines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.joenelumal.com/digital-cameras/new-fe-4000-and-fe-4010-another-identical-cameras-from-olympus/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joenelumal.com/?p=2575#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Hello,
I think the 4010&#039;s flash is better than its little sister.
And where it says it is waterproof? I am sure it is not at all.
Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I think the 4010&#8242;s flash is better than its little sister.<br />
And where it says it is waterproof? I am sure it is not at all.<br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.joenelumal.com @ 2012-02-09 20:57:57 -->
